<Ned> Front Porch
Subsections
Actions
- Delete
- Edit
- Reply
Comment by Gayle Rogers
Author: Gayle Rogers (78)
Date posted: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:58:40 PST
Comment on: "SORRY" - Apology to the Stolen Generations of Australia. (0)
Feedback score: 0 +|-
Part Two (of 3)
Rudd continues by publicly acknowledging the "elephant in the room" - the abhorrent policy decisions of the past and the suffering caused - and then addresses "Inter-generational responsibility" and dealing with the truth - "facing it, dealing with it, moving on from it."
".........let the parliament reflect for a moment on the following facts: that, between 1910 and 1970, between 10 and 30 per cent of Indigenous children were forcibly taken from their mothers and fathers; that, as a result, up to 50,000 children were forcibly taken from their families; that this was the product of the deliberate, calculated policies of the State as reflected in the explicit powers given to them under statute; that this policy was taken to such extremes by some in administrative authority that the forced extractions of children of so-called ‘mixed lineage’ were seen as part of a broader policy of dealing with ‘the problem of the Aboriginal population’.........."
"Then we come to the argument of intergenerational responsibility, also used by some to argue against giving an apology today. But let us remember the fact that the forced removal of Aboriginal children was happening as late as the early 1970s. The 1970s is not exactly a point in remote antiquity."