This is actually a companion thread to the www2.1 collaboration game of who are the 200 most trusted people in the world http://www.ned.com/group/ned/new s/6/

However since these rules are inspired by the main transformation the world of chnaging economics has in our view http://normanmacrae.com/netfuture.html#Anchor-Changin-27687 needed since 1984 - a transparent search for 30000 social and replicable projects - it is fitting to position this in Africa the test continent needing more such projects than anywhere else - due not to African peoples but the way that empires excavated from them, and then gave them token global aid as has fiannly been fessed up July 2007 by 13 national eladers and 20 CEOs at GB's UN speech http://peoplepower.jp

so here are some tastings of our transparency mapamkin g and Entrep[reneurial Revolutionm rules n ow in their 24 years of versioning; this is a quick first tour- will be delighted to go onto Q&A

Since transformation (change world http://changeworld.net) rules are messy things may I set up a parallel thread for trying to take Q&A on why our rules are in their current form. In particular: *we are interested in compound sustainability and empowerment of the service franchises that connect round the trusted person

*As oxbridge educated mathematicians (which delight in being told is quite a handicap in many ways!), we are interested in how relentless gravotated their human passion is, what life changing stories they openly tell; folowing Einstein's valutaion refereeing of lasting leadership, we believe that if in the Gandhian truth sense someone comes up with a service of the same need that is actually more sustaining, empowering, replicable then the first most trusted person would want to collaborate with the new one. This same shift to colaboration beyond competition was everywhere pervasive in the biograhpy of John von Neumann my dad wrote as one of his "retirement" projects.

*We know as entrepreneurs that no one person has ever by themselves flowed a save the world franchise. So the search for 200 names is in part a sideshow from mapping for example what 50 fields of human endeavour are the whole 200 working on that now need as much worldiwde media attention as the 50 most popular sports or fashions. Equally we need cross-sectional represnetaion. Its also a game of encouraging converts among the powerful who have resources but are sitting on the fences between goodwill and badwill auditing and giovernance.

*Educational encouragement also means for example our bar for youth to be in the top 200 is not as high as a 60 year old most trusted person

*Being Gandhian to the action learning core and flows of our beings, ie having respect for over the 100 year curicula of Satyahgraha - and having direct family relationships with this system method from year 14 of its development - part of our search for the 200 assumes that a network world can lose sustainability in at least 7 ways: systemised injustice of poverty including lack of access to productive opportunity times excess wars times lack of access to basic healthcare times excess lack of clean water and fuels(human/energy) times educational untruth times media untruth times professional/ruling monoplies disciplinary untruth