:Title: The Search for 200 most trusted entrepreneurs of 2007-2012 :Author: chris macrae :Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:58:14 PDT :Modified: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:45:01 PDT :URL: http://www.ned.com/group/ned/news/6/ Approximately monthly this thread aims to issue a differnt invitation around one of the 200 people sustainability world could most trust network weaving. Of course your suggestions are welcome September Invitation: If you come across a top 200 person that matches your life mission (or even one who isnt top 200 yet) I invite you to consider starting a group at razoo using this sort of model - are you a microcredit city? http://beta.razoo.com/groups/microcredit_city The first thing the group votes for is how to qualify such cities in 07,08, 09 raising the bar each year. eg with microcredit city we require 10+ people in same city to form an email circulation group and with a view to listening out for cases where the seed of microcredit started a whole new industry- eg in kenya microfinancing kickstart technolgy for farmers to grow a new crop became the supply chain for manufacturing a malaria medicine in Kenya http://beta.razoo.com/topic/show/207 ----------------------------------- .. raw:: html Research into Top10s field of Sustainability suggests Brits must petition Gordon Brown to ask the world's largest public broadcaster to focus attention time beyond sports, however attractive spectatorship may be. Why waste time on a 2012 Olympics if by then there is still no truth of sustainability leadership? To be, let alone grow up in interactive C21, we urge the need to cheerlead top10s such as .. raw:: html top10s.tv hubsworld.tv GB People Power petition http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/TrustPeoplePower/ ...Does the same collaboration leadership resonate in your city or hub? Integration of Whole Truth IF we are to live in a united world, capable of sustaining all childrens... Moreover: as we the peoples wave from one sustainability field top 10 to another, the urgency of a www2.1 search for 200 most trusted people in the world comes into sight. May I ask: is this a ned-compatible game worth hubbing around the world? .. raw:: html
The picture from the library of ER (Entrepreneurial Revolution) shows how the search is going - in other words our network of entrepreneurial revolutionaries are confident that we have found about 35 people whose stories are good enough by our rules of collaboration until other nominations come in

It is critical to the integrity/meaning translating our map into every culture to be aware that the rules we use are in their 24th version or year. They emerge from 60 years of questioning what is Entrperenurial Truth primarily by future hostorian quizmakers at The Economist and they specifically relate to this 1984 prediction on whether we would integrate localities into a globally networked world in a sustainable overarching system, or compound the opposite; extinction of the species is quite possible if social value is over-ruled by finacial numbers every quarter and by every boxed-in organisation. Back in 1984 deadline for all tipping points to ireversibility of what globalisation architecture we get is 2015; this is not a decimal point calendar science but we believe it would be utterly irresponsible to move that date now. For example, we did not expect the 21st Century to have a repeat of Kaiser Wilhem but we believe that is how world history of 2000-2007 is likely to be written up- at least by world citizens who family-dna values seek to love everyone else's culture- something well over 99% of peoppe researched in over 50 countries confirm as integral to http://peoplepower.tv and at the rolling top 100 video arcade http://valuetrue.com/home/community.cfm nominated by affilates of http://worldcitizen.tv All this means is that while you are welcome to play another 200 most trusted epicentres search game by different rulesm it will of course end up with a different map from Entrepreneurial Revolutionaries- and a different priortity of do now actions. We try to design our rules to be fit for the urgency of sustainability investmenty crises 24 year tracking informs. Since transformation (change world http://changeworld.net) rules are messy things may I set up a parallel thread for trying to take Q&A on why our rules are in their current form. In particular: .. raw:: html *we are interested in compound sustainability and empowerment of the service franchises that connect round the trusted person

*As oxbridge educated mathematicians (which delight in being told is quite a handicap in many ways!), we are interested in how relentless gravotated their human passion is, what life changing stories they openly tell; folowing Einstein's valutaion refereeing of lasting leadership, we believe that if in the Gandhian truth sense someone comes up with a service of the same need that is actually more sustaining, empowering, replicable then the first most trusted person would want to collaborate with the new one. This same shift to colaboration beyond competition was everywhere pervasive in the biograhpy of John von Neumann my dad wrote as one of his "retirement" projects.

*We know as entrepreneurs that no one person has ever by themselves flowed a save the world franchise. So the search for 200 names is in part a sideshow from mapping for example what 50 fields of human endeavour are the whole 200 working on that now need as much worldiwde media attention as the 50 most popular sports or fashions. Equally we need cross-sectional represnetaion. Its also a game of encouraging converts among the powerful who have resources but are sitting on the fences between goodwill and badwill auditing and giovernance.

*Educational encouragement also means for example our bar for youth to be in the top 200 is not as high as a 60 year old most trusted person

*Being Gandhian to the action learning core and flows of our beings, ie having respect for over the 100 year curicula of Satyahgraha - and having direct family relationships with this system method from year 14 of its development - part of our search for the 200 assumes that a network world can lose sustainability in at least 7 ways:
systemised injustice of poverty including lack of access to productive opportunity
times excess wars times lack of access to basic healthcare times excess lack of clean water and fuels(human/energy) times educational untruth times media untruth times professional/ruling monoplies disciplinary untruth companion thread Q&A rules http://www.ned.com/group/econo-politics/news/2/ NOW FOR THE REST OF THIS THREAD RSVP *Please discuss any more of this background over at rules. What I would love to see emerge in this thread is: *1 nominations of possible candidates and fearless discussions of why they do or do not map *2 News of how to collaborate with some of the 35 already on the map as time and sustainabilitty critical colalbaoration events theor peers are networking become announced , weaving different local opportunities to particpate production, enpowermen t and all the goodwill flows that can value multiply way above zero-sum economics (a professional ignorance quite capable of ending all our cildrens worlds) *3 If there is a thread somewhere else in this or others paces that we need to exhcange mutual news or networking energies with, do feel free to briefly bookmark it. A great advantage of this software is you can make a direct bridge bookmark between this conversation and where you expected people to enetre the other conversation, and vice versa. Thanks for your care for all subnetwork weavers of truth's trust-flow questioning and entrepreneurial system tarnsparency of mapmaking.