I have been working on a scoring system. Frankly it began with a self-assessment of what change world flows could my co-editors and I have any realistic chance of connecting. Here is an extract of my scores:

*140 GANDHI Lucknow http://cmseducation.org

*20 Muhammad YUNUS Grameen http://grameen.tv

*20 Chris ANDERSON, ted.com http://up200.tv/_wsn/page14.html

*18 Taddy BLECHER, CIDA http://cidaworld.tv (also map to mandela elders)

*16 Bill DRAYTON, Ashoka http://changemakers.info

*16 Sir Nick STERN

new september

*27 TheGreenChildren : Tom & Milla

As you can see I am extremely vulnerable in terms of scalable collaboration flow potential with only one change world contact that wholly trusts me and is right now (not some dream project in a never ending 6 months time but now) impacting changes towards human sustainability all over the world. I wonder if your profiles are similar.

the score is made from 3 multipliers: the origin with a chnage world gravity from 1 to 100 the depth of my relationship with that person from 0 to 1 the quality of of peer networks I have access to and their relationship with person of origin on a scale 0 to 10

the intent of this scoring system is to share knowledge as well as transprency of who has relationship permissions to whom, what future swarming opportunities could have huge leverage up or down, whether there are higher levels we can collaborate - for example if 2 people included the same name in tyheir listings of interest and one had a high score and the other low, would that be relevant to know?

footnote: postacrd fot those who may not know who needs over 100 scores relating to Lucknow: